How the Pro-Choice Movement Saved America by Cristina Page
PROCHOICEMOVEMENT.COM

Tuesday, August 01, 2006

Tony Pervkins

You can always rely on the Family Research Council to come up with the most outlandish and brutal sexual fantasy when any common sense solution is offered for our country's high rate of unintended pregnancy. It's most recent has been inspired by the FDA's apparent willingness to re-reconsider the emergency contraception over-the-counter (OTC) application, this time only for women 18 and older. The Family Research Council explains that by considering making a contraceptive that's 85% effective at preventing abortion available over-the-counter to adult women, "the Administration is considering making it easier for statutory rapists to obtain Plan B, the "morning after pill," by granting over-the-counter (OTC) status for women 18 years and older." How can a contraceptive available over-the-counter only to women, that's those 18 and older, aid statutory rapists? Only the depraved minds at the Family Research Council seem to know. And even though the Family Research Council opposes it, which usually means it's something you can enthusiastically support, many reproductive rights advocates view the administration's new interest in EC OTC as a transparent attempt to allow Von Eschenbach's nomination to head the FDA proceed later this week. After all, Von Eschenbach's has already weighed in on the EC OTC application -- offering an a surefire plan to deepsix the new version too. Von Eschenbach wrote on July 31 (yesterday), that unless Barr (the EC OTC applicant) can guarantee that no woman under 18 will use the drug without medical supervision, the product will remain "Rx Only". This would hold Barr to an impossible standard--thereby creating a reason to once again delay or deny the application.

Comments:

  • At 1:32 PM, Nick said…

    "America needs no words from me to see how your decision in Roe v. Wade has deformed a great nation. The so-called right to abortion has pitted mothers against their children and women against men. It has sown violence and discord at the heart of the most intimate human relationships. It has aggravated the derogation of the father's role in an increasingly fatherless society. It has portrayed the greatest of gifts -- a child -- as a competitor, an intrusion, and an inconvenience. It has nominally accorded mothers unfettered dominion over the independent lives of their physically dependent sons and daughters"
    And, in granting this unconscionable power, it has exposed many women to unjust and selfish demands from their husbands or other sexual partners. Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being's entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign." (Mother Teresa -- "Notable and Quotable," Wall Street Journal, 2/25/94, p. A14)

     
  • At 2:25 PM, Cristina Page said…

    Nick, I find it telling that you choose not to speak for yourself but instead hide behind the words of a woman who, through her actions (as documented in Christopher's Hitchen's book about her), showed very little concern for the living. If you are so passionate about stopping abortion why do you support a movement and it's "leaders" who oppose preventing abortion? It may be more satisfying to be sanctimonious than it is to admit the movement you support is responsible for the world's highest abortion rates. Why is it, you should ask yourself, that the countries with the highest abortion rates in the world are the ones that have adopted the strongest pro-life policies? Why is it that the countries with the lowest abortion rates in the world are the ones with the strongest pro-choice policies? And why don't you and your brethren take heed? The fact that these are questions you are unwilling to ask is why I question your concern about abortion. I think pro-lifers like yourself delight in all your righteous and fiery rhetoric while presiding over an agenda that's the source of the problem. If you were truly serious in your position on abortion you would be troubled that not one pro-life organization in the United States supports the only proven ways to prevent abortion (contraception) and instead are working to strip Americans of their birth control also. This conflict has never really been about abortion and making the need for abortion unnecessary has never been the pro-life movement's goal. As your choice of post suggests it's about making the US into a theocracy. Abortion serves as a fig leaf for a very different agenda.

     

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home