<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21582956/posts/summary</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 19:07:15 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Cristina Page, ProChoiceMovement.com</title><description></description><link>http://www.prochoicemovement.com/blog.html</link><managingEditor>Cristina Page</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>15</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21582956/posts/summary/116283018678935508</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-11-06T14:42:14.195-05:00</atom:updated><title>The Right to Lie Movement: Obstruction of Truth and the South Dakota Ban</title><atom:summary type='text'>Tomorrow, the voters of South Dakota will consider, by referendum, the law passed by their legislature, and signed by their Governor, that bans abortion in their state. If South Dakotans support the law, it will create a direct challenge to the Roe v. Wade decision and send it on a course to the Supreme Court where the balance in favor of Roe now teeters by one pro-choice vote. If the South </atom:summary><link>http://www.prochoicemovement.com/2006/11/right-to-lie-movement-obstruction-of.html</link><author>Cristina Page</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21582956/posts/summary/115444632779508487</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-11-03T13:32:57.216-05:00</atom:updated><title>Tony Per&lt;em>v&lt;/em>kins</title><atom:summary type='text'>You can always rely on the Family Research Council to come up with the most outlandish and brutal sexual fantasy when any common sense solution is offered for our country's high rate of unintended pregnancy. It's most recent has been inspired by the FDA's apparent willingness to re-reconsider the emergency contraception over-the-counter (OTC) application, this time only for women 18 and older. </atom:summary><link>http://www.prochoicemovement.com/2006/08/tony-pervkins.html</link><author>Cristina Page</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21582956/posts/summary/115405466058645854</guid><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 02:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-07-27T22:50:57.820-04:00</atom:updated><title>How is Locking Up Grandma Pro-Family?</title><atom:summary type='text'>Senator Clinton, arguing against the "Child Custody Protection Act" (or The Teen Endangerment Act), yesterday offered a brief break from all the "pro-life" distortions with an eloquent reality-based speech from the Senate floor. Here are her comments unedited:

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton on the floor of the U.S. Senate

July 25, 2006:
I met the 14-year-old who already had a baby, and I met </atom:summary><link>http://www.prochoicemovement.com/2006/07/how-is-locking-up-grandma-pro-family.html</link><author>Cristina Page</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21582956/posts/summary/114266252848794288</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 05:58:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-07-20T15:34:41.256-04:00</atom:updated><title>Show Me State Shows Pro-lifers' True Agenda</title><atom:summary type='text'>Missouri Right to Life suceeded today at eliminating access to birth control for the state's poorest residents. The Associated Press reports that the Missouri state legislature "voted 96-59 to delete the funding for contraception" at local health clinics "after Rep. Susan Phillips told lawmakers that anti-abortion groups such as Missouri Right to Life were opposed to the spending."</atom:summary><link>http://www.prochoicemovement.com/2006/03/show-me-state-shows-pro-lifers-true.html</link><author>Cristina Page</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21582956/posts/summary/114598787335104350</guid><pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-06-08T01:02:00.723-04:00</atom:updated><title>blog flog</title><atom:summary type='text'>Please check out my debate with rabidly (though typical for a professional pro-lifer) anti-contraception, anti-child-care, anti-working mother, pro-life activist Jennifer Roback Morse. In her review of my book she challenged me to a debate. I happily took her up on the offer. (For transcript of the debate, go to the April 23 archive)</atom:summary><link>http://www.prochoicemovement.com/2006/04/blog-flog.html</link><author>Cristina Page</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21582956/posts/summary/114550701514439643</guid><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 03:40:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-04-25T23:21:04.416-04:00</atom:updated><title>Another sensible common ground plea gets ignored by pro-life groups</title><atom:summary type='text'>Pro-Choice Senator Hillary Clinton and Pro-Life Senator Harry Reid have written a simple "common ground" prescription for those hoping for real solutions to our nation's high abortion rate. Most interesting in their call to action is that they place blame for the high rates of abortion squarely at the feet of our nation's pro-life groups and their campaigns against the proven abortion reduction </atom:summary><link>http://www.prochoicemovement.com/2006/04/another-sensible-common-ground-plea.html</link><author>Cristina Page</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21582956/posts/summary/114251999332085886</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-03-18T01:24:41.886-05:00</atom:updated><title>Wisconsin sues FDA for role in causing unintended pregnancies --leading to high costs for the state</title><atom:summary type='text'>Wisconsin Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager joined the lawsuit filed by the Center for Reproductive Rights against the FDA. Lautenschlager charges that the FDA's ideologically-based decision to keep emergency contraception from becoming available over the counter has resulted in many otherwise preventable unintended pregnancies and has driven up costs to the state to care for births to teen </atom:summary><link>http://www.prochoicemovement.com/2006/03/wisconsin-sues-fda-for-role-in-causing.html</link><author>Cristina Page</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21582956/posts/summary/114022491506486090</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-03-18T01:21:01.343-05:00</atom:updated><title>Recent reviews of my book</title><atom:summary type='text'>Check out recent reviews of my book by Alternet and Planned Parenthood Federation of America</atom:summary><link>http://www.prochoicemovement.com/2006/02/recent-reviews-of-my-book.html</link><author>Cristina Page</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21582956/posts/summary/114239641002069689</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 04:08:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-03-14T23:27:21.960-05:00</atom:updated><title>ConspirECy</title><atom:summary type='text'>Knight Ridder newspapers report on recently released documents that indicate that politics, not science, caused the FDA rejected the over-the-counter application of Plan B emergency contraception. Every medical and scientific evaluation favored the proposal. But according to an FDA document released through (the great) Congressman Henry Waxman's office, the prime mover in this conspiracy was Mark</atom:summary><link>http://www.prochoicemovement.com/2006/03/conspirecy.html</link><author>Cristina Page</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21582956/posts/summary/114239408632311238</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-03-14T23:01:02.876-05:00</atom:updated><title>What if there were no pro-life movement? Prediction: abortion rates would plummet</title><atom:summary type='text'>The New York Times recently conducted a study of pro-life parental notification laws in the states and found they have little impact on the rate of abortion. Other studies of these laws found that they do succeed at something else: a dramatic increase in the number of late term abortions. It should be alarming to honest pro-lifers to find that the organizations they have happily sent donations </atom:summary><link>http://www.prochoicemovement.com/2006/03/what-if-there-were-no-pro-life.html</link><author>Cristina Page</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21582956/posts/summary/114239336326973225</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 03:08:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-03-14T22:54:03.133-05:00</atom:updated><title>If you are going to get raped in South Dakota, make sure you're a "good girl" and make sure to get "brutally raped" too</title><atom:summary type='text'>With the new ban on abortion in South Dakota, many have wondered what the state legislators were really thinking by banning abortion in cases of rape, incest and even to protect a woman's health. When asked by a PBS reporter if there was ever a case in which he could imagine granting a woman the right to a legal abortion, South Dakota legislator Bill DiNapoli described one circumstance quite </atom:summary><link>http://www.prochoicemovement.com/2006/03/if-you-are-going-to-get-raped-in-south.html</link><author>Cristina Page</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21582956/posts/summary/114084093523971692</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-02-26T13:57:41.013-05:00</atom:updated><title>South Dakota Loses It</title><atom:summary type='text'>South Dakota is not the state we, as a nation, look to for cutting-edge ideas. And yet, lawmakers in South Dakota are setting out to transform our nation. By banning abortion in their state, as they did Thursday (pending the Governor's stamp that looks likely), South Dakota has produced a direct challenge the Roe v. Wade decision which prohibits states from obstructing women's right to legal </atom:summary><link>http://www.prochoicemovement.com/2006/02/south-dakota-loses-it.html</link><author>Cristina Page</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21582956/posts/summary/113951376905419601</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-02-26T13:45:59.340-05:00</atom:updated><title>Misleading America</title><atom:summary type='text'>During last Tuesday night's State of the Union address, George Bush claimed that his abstinence policies led to the lowest rate of abortion in the last three decades. It was a throw away line, a wink to his religious right base. In fact, what he did was take credit for the results of another president's policies, policies profoundly different from his own. 

The abortion rates that Bush was </atom:summary><link>http://www.prochoicemovement.com/2006/02/misleading-america.html</link><author>Cristina Page</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21582956/posts/summary/114084036340102206</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:03:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-02-24T23:06:03.413-05:00</atom:updated><title>&lt;a href="http://www.buzzflash.com/reviews/06/02/rev06028.html">buzzflash review&lt;/a></title><atom:summary type='text'>Could we resist a book whose very title comes out swinging, without apology? Of course not.

Just opening the book to the title page and seeing, "How the Pro-Choice Movement Saved America," was liberating and defiant. (Warning to Joe Biden and other spineless Democrats. You won't like this book. It makes no apologies and relentlessly pursues the forces of darkness in America and forces them back </atom:summary><link>http://www.prochoicemovement.com/2006/02/buzzflash-review.html</link><author>Cristina Page</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21582956/posts/summary/114030240879074977</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-02-23T12:20:42.270-05:00</atom:updated><title>Bush executes US pro-lifers' International anti-contraception agenda</title><atom:summary type='text'>In my book, I document a fringe US pro-life group's enormous influence on Bush's foreign policy in matters of international family planning programs. The anti-contraception group, Population Research Institute, based in Front Royal, Virginia, leads smear campaigns against relief agencies, like UNFPA, that provide emergency maternity services and family planning care in the most war torn and </atom:summary><link>http://www.prochoicemovement.com/2006/02/bush-executes-us-pro-lifers_18.html</link><author>Cristina Page</author></item></channel></rss>